Gigastone 4K Camera Pro 32GB

  • Obtained from: Amazon
  • Advertised capacity: 32GB
  • Logical capacity: 31,267,487,744 bytes
  • Physical capacity: 31,267,487,744 bytes
  • Fake/skimpy flash: Skimpy (2.29% skimp)
  • Protected area: 83,886,080 bytes
  • Adjusted skimp: 2.03%
  • Speed class markings: U3, V30, A2
  • CID data:
    • Manufacturer ID: 0x74
    • OEM ID: 0x4a60 (ASCII: J<)
    • Product name: 0x3030303030 (ASCII: 00000)
    • Product revision: 0x10
Sample #12345Average
Price paid$8.99$9.00$9.00$9.00$9.00$9.00
Manufacture dateAug 2023Aug 2023Not yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Serial number0x14a014980x14a014adNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Sequential read speed (MB/sec)93.4594.17Not yet testedNot yet testedNot yet tested93.81
Sequential write speed (MB/sec)27.3828.19Not yet testedNot yet testedNot yet tested27.79
Random read speed (IOPS/sec)2,781.652,764.08Not yet testedNot yet testedNot yet tested2,772.87
Random write speed (IOPS/sec)455.89499.68Not yet testedNot yet testedNot yet tested477.79
Read/write cycles to first errorNot yet determinedNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Read/write cycles to 0.1% failure thresholdNot yet determinedNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Read/write cycles to complete failureNot yet determinedNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Total days to complete failureNot yet determinedNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Card reader usedJJC UTC-4ACJJC UTC-4ACNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Package frontN/A
Package backNot availableN/A
Card frontNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Card backNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A

Discussion

Since Gigastone seems to have multiple lines of cards, I thought it would be good to test out more than just one. It turns out that this one is decent in terms of performance: all performance metrics were above average (with the exception of sequential write speeds, which were slightly below average). Random read speeds were more than one standard deviation above average; however, even this is far short of what would have been needed for the A2 marking it carries. In fact, thanks to its slow sequential write speeds, it failed to meet the threshold for any of the performance marks that it carries. (Again, I’ll throw my standard disclaimer here: perhaps this card would have done better if it had been tested under proper conditions.)

On the endurance front, it’s too early to draw any conclusions just yet:

  • Sample #1 has not yet reached the 2,000 read/write cycle mark. It is expected to get there sometime in March 2025.
  • Sample #2 has not yet reached the 2,000 read/write cycle mark. It is expected to get there sometime in April 2025.
  • Samples #3-#5 are still in the package, waiting to be tested.

February 27, 2025