onn. 32GB

  • Obtained from: Walmart
  • Price paid: $4.49*
  • Advertised capacity: 32GB
  • Logical capacity: 30,992,760,832 bytes
  • Physical capacity: 30,992,760,832 bytes
  • Fake/skimpy flash: Skimpy (3.15% skimp)
  • Protected area: 83,886,080 bytes (inaccessible)
  • Speed class markings: Class 10**, U1, V10, A1
  • CID data:
    • Manufacturer ID: 0x27***
    • OEM ID: 0x5048 (ASCII: PH)***
    • Product name: 0x5344333247 (ASCII: SD32G)
    • Product revision: 0x60

* This card was sold in a 2-pack; the price shown is the price for the 2-pack divided by 2.

** This marking appears on the card, but does not appear on the product package.

*** This manufacturer ID/OEM ID combination is pretty well known to belong to Phison.

Sample #1234Average
Manufacture DateAug 2024Aug 2024Aug 2024Aug 2024N/A
Serial number0xdb2401d50xdb233f8f0xdb45d9cb0xdb43fc5bN/A
Sequential read speed (MB/sec)87.4887.2884.3484.4685.89
Sequential write speed (MB/sec)28.4428.0328.2327.8128.13
Random read speed (IOPS/sec)1,120.621,120.181,068.511,107.091,104.10
Random write speed (IOPS/sec)259.26254.93259.83261.19258.80
Read/write cycles to first errorNot yet determined832Not yet determined818825
Read/write cycles to 0.1% failure thresholdNot yet determined872Not yet determined866869
Read/write cycles to complete failureNot yet determined993Not yet determined1,0081,001
Total days to complete failureNot yet determined25Not yet determined2726
Card reader usedJJC CR-UTC4ACJJC CR-UTC4ACJJC CR-UTC4ACJJC CR-UTC4ACN/A
Package frontN/A
Package backNot availableN/A
Card frontN/A
Card backN/A

Discussion

This was one that I spotted while walking around Walmart one day. On a whim, I decided to pick up a few to test. The most economical way to purchase them was in a 2-pack, so I picked up two 2-packs.

Once I opened the package and saw the back side of the card, it was immediately apparent to me that these cards were sourced from PNY — no one else (that I’ve come across, at least) stamps “Made in Taiwan” the back of their cards. The CID data indicates that the cards were manufactured by Phison — which lines up with the other PNY cards I’ve tested.

Performance is about what I would expect from a private label brand like this — not great, but also not the worst I’ve seen. Sequential read and write speeds were close to average; random read and write speeds were below average.

All four samples are currently undergoing endurance testing:

  • Sample #1 has not yet hit the 2,000 read/write cycle mark. It is currently expected to get there sometime in May 2025.
  • Sample #2’s first error was a series of bit flips, across 8 non-contiguous sectors, during round 833. The number of failed sectors increased quickly over the following rounds, taking less than 1,000 read/write cycles to reach the 50% failure threshold. Here’s the graph of this card’s progression:

  • Sample #3 has not yet hit the 2,000 read/write cycle mark. It is currently expected to get there sometime in May 2025.
  • Sample #4’s first error was a series of bit flips, across 2 adjacent sectors, during round 818. Like sample #2, the number of failed sectors increased quickly over the following rounds — just barely making it past the 1,000 read/write cycle mark before failing. Curiously, however, it did not reach the 50% failure threshold — it experienced a corrupted CSD failure, leading the reader to believe that it was only 250MB in size. This happened after about 36% of the card’s sectors had been flagged as “bad”. However, since it got close, I’ll show the graph of this card’s progression through the endurance test:

This is a curious result for a Phison-produced card — in fact, it’s the worst result of any Phison-produced card I’ve tested so far. The way in which samples #2 and #4 failed is pretty similar to other low-quality flash cards that I’ve tested — and thus far, Phison hasn’t been known for putting out low-quality flash. As of the time of this writing, the average Phison-produced card has survived 5,667 read/write cycles — and so far, two of these cards lasted less than 20% of that. This kinda puts a stain — at least, in my opinion — on Phison as a manufacturer. I guess this means that anyone is capable of putting out low-quality flash.

So let’s review: sequential I/O speeds were only OK, random I/O speeds were poor, and endurance (at least, on two out of the four samples) was pretty poor. On top of that, at $0.145 per gigabyte, it’s only an OK value — it got outperformed in pretty much every area by the Lexar Blue 633x and the Kingston Canvas Select Plus (at least, as far as 32GB cards go). Given all this, I think my verdict is “don’t buy these”.

April 20, 2025 (current number of read/write cycles updates automatically every hour)